Evidently, there is no single way of managing every employee. One has to apply a contingency approach to leadership that suits a given individual’s needs.
It is the roles of managers to apply their knowledge of people and their behavior to build a climate, in which people are motivated, work together and become more effective persons. A successful and effective organization ensures achievement of human, organizational and social objectives. People find their jobs and work enjoyable when they find cooperation and teamwork. Organizations benefit since better quality products are produced at lower costs and society benefits because of better products. More satisfied citizens and a general climate of growth and cooperation.
Of all the organizational resources, people are the most valuable. Managing people is the most difficult and the most rewarding exercise.
A great understanding of the way managers manage has come out of Douglas Mc Gregor’s study. According to him, all managers fall under the two specific theories: Theory X and Theory Y.
Managers of the Theory X type have an autocratic approach and assume that most people dislike work, and therefore try to avoid anything in the nature of work. Because of such an assumption, such managers resort to a coercion, control and threat to secure high performance from their subordinates.
On the contrary, managers of the Theory Y type have a humanistic and supportive approach to managing people. They assume that people are not, by nature, lazy and indolent and that they would surely be willing to release their potential under appropriate environment.
It is the Theory Y assumptions which form a strong basis for developing human relations and work satisfaction since no self-respecting person will regard work as a curse on human kind but as an opportunity for progress.
That is why in their modern human resources approach, many corporations emphasize the supportive behavior which helps people grow in their control and expand their capabilities with the associated feelings of work satisfaction. This is also different from the traditional approach to management where managers decided what should be done and then closely controlled employees to ensure task performance. Most of the employees weren’t satisfied with this kind of impersonal approach.
In order to keep the employees satisfied, managers need to know what motivates the individual and provide the necessary leadership support.
People have varying attitudes which affect the way they view their jobs and even life in general. Some people have achievement motivation and are fired with a drive to overcome challenges and then grow. They seek accomplishment for its own sake and acquiring wealth is incidental to them. Some people have affiliation motivation and exercise a drive to relate to people. They work better and get satisfied if they are surrounded by friends and are regularly complimented for their work. Some others have competence motivation with a strong drive to do a high quality work and derive an inner satisfaction by accomplishing the work. They also expect high quality from others and get impatient if they deliver a shoddy job. There are a few people who have power motivation with a strong drive to influence people and situations.
Managers need to analyze and understand the motivational patterns of their subordinates to keep them satisfied. An achievement motivated employee may be given a job in terms of its challenge while a competence motivated person can be given job with high degree of quality requirements.
Thus a manager can communicate and operate with his employees in ways that suit the particular person’s needs, drives, interest and points of view. Evidently, there is no single way of managing every employee. One has to apply a contingency approach to leadership that suits a given individual needs to enable him willingly carry-out his job with a sense of fulfillment and success.
Mention may be made in this context of the well known need hierarchy theory of A.H. Maslow. It says that all needs have a certain priority. As the more basic needs are fulfilled, a person seeks to satisfy the higher level needs. According to Maslow, the five levels of needs are basic physiological needs, safety and security, belonging and social needs, esteem and status and finally self-actualization and fulfillment. A person starts fulfilling the needs one after the other. Once a need is fulfilled, it doesn’t motivate by what he is seeking than by what he already had. In simple words, man works for bread alone only when he has no bread. Therefore, we can conclude that need satisfaction is a continuous task for managements in order to keep their employees perpetually motivated. As one need gets satisfied, yet another dominating need has to be understood and brought out, the satisfaction of which becomes the driving force for the employee during the subsequent period of work.
Herzberg studied employee satisfaction and dissatisfaction and came out with his two factor theory. Accordingly, two separate factors are responsible for employee dissatisfaction and satisfaction. There are called hygiene factors leads to dissatisfaction. These include company policy, quality of supervision, pay, security, working conditions, status and relations with peers, supervisors and subordinates. The presence of all these brings employees to a neutral state without dissatisfaction.
On the contrary, motivators are essential for satisfying or motivating the employees. These factors are achievement, recognition, advancement, work itself, possibility of growth and responsibility. Herzberg’s model has explained what managers for many years had been wondering to know why their fancy personnel policies and fringe benefits were not increasing employee motivation. Critics however say that Herzberg’s model does not give enough emphasis to the motivating qualities of pay, status and relations with others.
One important development of the two factor idea of Herzberg is the job enrichment and quality of work life that gained a widespread popularity in due course. The traditional design of scientific management focused attention on specialization and efficiency for the performance of narrow tasks. The idea was to lower costs by using unskilled repetitive labor to do a small art of the job. This gave rise to many problems. Specialization isolated workers from their fellow workers leading to absenteeism, isolation and loss of pride in work leading to poor quality of work life.
A need was therefore felt not only to redesign the jobs to give adequate attention to human needs and aspirations of workers. In other words the attempt was on humanizing the work so as to have the best fit among workers, jobs, technology and the environment.
In job enrichment, the work itself is made more challenging and achievement is encouraged providing opportunity for growth and advancement. While employees are final judges of what enriches their jobs, managements can try to judge what trends enrich the jobs and try these changes to determine whether employees felt the job enrichment. If employees perceive the job as important and interesting and are given some freedom of work and feedback on progress at regular intervals, they tend to consider jobs satisfying. However, job enrichment programs have their own limitations as some employees may not want enriched jobs and therefore a contingency approach needs to be taken depending on the given situation.
Lack of motivation is reflected in organization in the form of absences, slowdowns, strikes, low performances, disciplinary actions, employee turnover, etc. Simply defined, job satisfaction is the favorableness or un-favorableness with which employees view their work.
It reflects the gap between one’s expectations of the job and the rewards that the job provides. As employees’ expectations are rising the management practices should simultaneously be improving to maintain satisfaction. Job satisfaction therefore requires attention, diagnosis and treatment.
And this should be done on a continuous basis since job satisfaction is dynamic in nature. A satisfied worker today doesn’t remain satisfied for ever.
Keeping employees continually satisfied in their jobs is no doubt a complex and tough job. But as every manager knows, it is essential if one has to maintain a human culture in organizations which is so vital for employee motivation.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: A freelance writer who meticulously structured and maintained blogs just for you:A LIFE SO FAR AWAYand my other blog:OFW: THIS IS MY LIFE AND STORY Thank you for your valuable time. Follow my business & writings and you'll find what life's meant to be.
